Any nonelected processes of making and/or using an allowable product should be considered for rejoinder
If an examiner (1) determines that the claims do not meet the unity of invention requirement and (2) requires election of a single invention, when all of the claims drawn to the elected invention are allowable (i.e., meet the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 101, 102, 103 and 112), the nonelected invention(s) should be considered for rejoinder. Any nonelected product claim that requires all the limitations of an allowable product claim, and any nonelected process claim that requires all the limitations of an allowable process claim, should be rejoined. See MPEP § . The examiner should notify applicants of potential rejoinder of non-elected process claims by placing form paragraph 8. at the end of any lack of unity determination made between a product and a process of making the product or between a product and a process of using the product.
As provided in 37 CFR 1.475(a), a national stage application shall relate to one invention only or to a group of inventions so linked as to form a single general inventive concept ("requirement of unity of invention"). The expression "special technical features" shall mean those technical features that define a contribution which each of the claimed inventions, considered as a whole, makes over the prior art.
asi como Nueve films asi como su proyecto soyamante; lo plantea de un modo cierto y no ha transpirado bastante Cristalino. Cara a un universo centrado en el yo, en las sensaciones, los estados sobre animo y no ha transpirado las emociones, seria urgente recuperar el termino amor en su significado mas hondo.