Microsoft to invest Stac Judgment off $120 Million

30 Jul Microsoft to invest Stac Judgment off $120 Million

81 Stuart J. Johnston, Microsoft Settles to possess Little bit of Stac, Computerworld, June 27, 1994, at 30 (Microsoft paid $39.9 million for 155’o of Stac, and an additional $43 million over 43 months for a license to Stac’s data compression technology); Doug Barney, Microsoft, Stac Care for Dispute; Microsoft Finally Will pay Upwards, InfoWorld, June 27, 1994, at 14.

83 As explained in Section V.C., infra, the superficially irrational behavior of undermining the application vendors that produce programs that run on Microsoft’s operating system is logical specifically because Microsoft has an independent economic incentive to monopolize the s.

85 Amy Cortese, Business Week, Dec. 19, 1994, supra, at 35 (HP, Compaq and other big U.S. PC makers plan to bundle Windows 95 into their machines).

86 Look for Lawrence J. Microsoft: Not so Marvelous, Bay Area Computer Currents, Dec. 1, 1994, at 98, 101 (Ex. 1); Carole Patton, Computerworld, Nov. 14, 1994, supra, at 57 (Ex. 8).

88 Don Clark, Microsoft to order Intuit Inside Inventory Treaty, Wall St. J., Oct. 14, 1994, at A3 (86% of retail store sales); Karen Epper, Software Price Shakes Upwards Family Banking, Amer. Banker, Oct. 17, 1994, at 1, 25 (80-85%).

89 Michelle Flores, Wants More information, Seattle Times, Nov. 22, 1994, at B11; Michael Schrage, Microsoft Makes Thousands; Can it Shape the management of It?, Washington Post, Oct. 21, 1994, at B3; Brent Schlender, Fortune, Jan. 16, 1995, supra, at 36.

91 Brent Schendler, Fortune, Jan. 16, 1995, supra, at 4748; find in addition to, Michael I. Miller, PC Magazine, Jan. 24, 1995, supra, at 80 (Ex. 25) (“Microsoft could require just a small service charge on each transaction. Or it could make money on the float — the interest in the few seconds it takes to move money from one place to another. Or both.”).

92 For example, leading industry analyst Rick Sherlund of Goldman Sachs predicted that with the settlement, Microsoft “should dominate the market https://datingranking.net/muzmatch-review/ for desktop software for the next 10 years.” And another leading analyst, Richard Shaffer concluded that “It]he operating system wars are over — Microsoft is the winner . Microsoft is the Standard Oil of its day.” Andrew Schulman, Microsoft’s Grip Toward Software Tightened Because of the Antitrust Package, Dr. Dobb’s Journal of Software Tools, Oct. 1994, at 143 (Ex. 13).

93 See John M. Goodman, The newest 2 Heavyweights Go Other Round, InfoWorld, Aug. 29, 1994, at 87 (rating PC-DOS version 6.3 above MS-DOS version 6.22) and Earle Robinson, DOS-version Insanity? Integration Living with Dos, Windows Sources, Oct. 1994, at 163 (“my choice would be the IBM . . . it’s cheaper”) and Yael Li-Ron, Desktop computer Dos 6.3: 2 and you will 2: Separated In the Beginning, PC-Computing, bra computers ship with MS-DOS).

Probe away from Microsoft was Expanded – Fairness Dept

94 Don Clark Laurie Hays, Microsoft’s The new Product sales Programs Mark Issues, Wall St. J., Dec. 12, 1994, at B6 (Ex. 41).

96 All of these problems are discussed in Rory O’Connor, San Jose Mercury News, Nov. 13, 1994, supra, at 1A, 28A (Ex. 34).

Magid

99 Indeed, Microsoft’s operating system “lock-in” has permitted it to bring demonstrably inferior products to market (products that did not enjoy any appreciable consumer acceptance) without negative consequences to the company. See Michael Morris, Microsoft Package: A lack of, Far too late, S.F. Examiner, July 24, 1994, at C-5. (Ex. 33)

one hundred Joseph Farrell, Hunter K. Monroe and you may Garth Saloner, New Vertical Team Regarding Business and you may Systems Battle Versus Role Battle, October 1994 (working report).

101 Find, age.grams., supra, note 32. (Microsoft presently holds greater than 90% of the X86 operating system market share); Christopher O’Malley, Personal Computing, October 1986, supra, at 181, 183 (“Microsoft’s operating system” has “better than 95 percent” share of the X86 systems.)